86% is a great score! I have a Sony A9, so fully understand what you mean -- and I have the Sony 28mm, 50mm macro and 85 lenses. On the Sony forum, we occasionally hear sad stories about cameras dunked in rogue waves and when toppled off a tripod onto granite rocks. (Fine old American slang, meaning to speak loudly, usually from your butt). Compare that Fuji lens to something like the Nikon 180-400, or the 200-500. When I stop down the 70-200 from 2.8 to 4 my immediate thought is: really? Not because of the ISO performance alone (it really isn't two stops better, more like one stop), but because of the better bit of everything - ISO, optics (better sharpness, contrast, lower aberrations), crop-ability, hand-hold-ability (perhaps due to larger pixels).I'm not going to relaunch that whole debate but maybe what one could also consider is that smaller/lighter/cheaper lenses on FF are sometimes also worse in quality than their GM or 'pro' versions. Enjoy your new kit." So DoF and FoV were not perfectly matched, there was no trick intended. How may companies do that. You will need to go take following pictures:These are facts, not fairy tales, facts. Read on to learn about our favorite enthusiast long zoom cameras.What's the best camera for under $500? Sorry, but you're going to have to prove that "I can crop my FF + $200 and get the same IQ than your APS-C $500 lens". I am sure soon we will start to see interesting bundles for the xh1.Lumix 84% gets GOLD...Fujifilm 86% gets SILVER. I was thinking "how come there is noise in the blue sky at base ISO?".
The buttons are hard to tricky to access etc.
Die Fuji X-H1 ist das neuste Flaggschiff aus dem Hause Fujifilm. Why would I want to deal with a company that doesn't respect its customers? It's like, "ok, some crop camera can handle the noise as well as FF, with the same DR, but still any FF must be better because it's logic".Finally, no, you're wrong, the FF50mm 1.8 on crop body will not crop anything, physically same hole, same light coming through. Sheer genius.
1:1?
"arguably" - if you say some lenses produce better IQ, there should not be "arguably" because they either do or do not.Silver. Sensor size is not important for some. ..For many, theses features are more important als 1 stop better noise control.So X-H1 may be better for some... out of the pure specsSpecs-wise, the Sony looks great, but I read that the IBIS isn't that impressive. I doubt anyone will buy the X-H1 now. All content, design, and layout are Copyright © 1998 - 2020 Digital Photography Review All Rights Reserved. Whenever a new iPhone is released, it's more expensive than the previous one and they keep selling older models at high prices. With that density you don't need an APS-C for reach.I admit my first encounter with MFT was difficult.
That said, I also shoot on the streets and the size of the X-H1 is too intrusive for stealthy situations--you might as well go full-frame DSLR. Xt2 was already an expensive Aps c and the xh1 takes it to another level. The processor can read it much faster, resulting in less distortion. Want to jump on board but my camera hasn't been manufactured yet.Fuji need better good sensor. Just buy the system that has the lens you need and the body that is featured the way you want. Sonys were ergonomically poor and the lenses so heavy I may as well stay with Nikon. It gets the same weather sealing as Olympus's Pro lenses, but does it stand up optically? „sehr gut“ (4 von 5 Sternen) „Die X-H1 von Fujifilm ist opulent ausgestattet und liefert eine sehr gute Bildqualität. I have a D750 so I was wonder, because is one of the most use cameras for weddings were the most IQ is needed.That is because Fuji meters differently than Sony.